Archive for the ‘Internet’ Category

Internet Resources for Doing Business Journalism in China

星期二, 六月 21st, 2011

This is a post about my presentation at Financial Media Institute 2011, held by Hong Kong Baptist University’s journalism school last month. You may find the slides and my talking points below.

Imagine you just got an assignment from your editor on a business story. However you found the internet is down. You are disconnected from the internet. What would you do?

The students in the Financial Media Institute 2011 has obviously never really thought of this question – they suggested different ways including calling for help, going out of the house, etc. But getting connected is the ultimate solution.

That makes sense, and here is the point: internet resource is already part of the daily work of journalists and editors. The question is how to be better equipped, so that reporters can get the stories done more efficiently and vividly. Some steps are FYI. Remember that technology updates just too fast that this post might be outdate just 30 days later.

1. FIND DATA

It is always too late to find the relevant data when you need it. So keep the important databases in your bookmark, and review them from now and then. To get you started with some of the most-used databases and directories in HK and China, try these (thanks to Irene Jay Liu for introducing some of them to me):

-          Hong Kong’s Census and Statistics Department is a one-stop shop for government statistics on economic indicators, demographics, health, labor, and many other areas.

-          Hong Kong Exchange: Warehouse of information for companies listed in Hong Kong, including interim and annual reports, and required disclosures such as acquisitions of more than 15 per cent of a company, change of senior executives.

-          Webb-site: An independent website that tracks HK company disclosures, news and other events. A good place to start, but it is always good practice to check back with the original source.

2. FIND PEOPLE

Hong Kong enjoys the advantage of required information transparency, while China is more lacking behind with unpublicized data in most the sectors. However, even with HK’s public data, it is always suggested to double check the data before you use them in your story. And it is never a good idea to directly citing press release or any government reports, because you never know how the interpretations are made, and if any dark side of the story is faked or disguised.

So after you find more about the company that you are reporting, the next step is to figure out who are the power brokers. Here are some databases to start with:

-          Renlifang: a search engine to explore relationships in China, which automatically summarizes the Web for entities (such as people, locations and organizations) with a modest web presence. It has fancy visualization, but Microsoft also clearly knows its limitations, as said on its website:

The prototype currently only contains information extracted from 1 billion Chinese public Web pages, therefore it is possible that some information for people with a substantial Web presence is still missing in our index;

Some names and relationships could be incorrect, and the information may not be update-to-date;

Name disambiguation is still largely unsolved. Some people with popular/common names may find that their information has been mixed with other people of the same name;

Some of the summarization features are currently only available for people. We are currently working on these for other entities.

-          WhoRunsHK: an interactive project of the South China Morning Post that maps the connections among the most influential people and organisations in Hong Kong. You may check out this video how SCMP used this database to write up the story on Stanley Ho’s family saga. This project is not actively updated after Jan 2011, but still worth exploring.

-          GlobalExperts: this is where you can get someone to comment, a free online resource of opinion leaders who provide quick reactions and accurate analysis to journalists worldwide on complex political, social and religious issues and crises.

3. TELL BETTER STORIES

Now that assume you get the story already. What is the next? You may of course turn that into one 300-word quick business story, or one 8000-word feature story on all the dirty details. But what if your reader only have 10 minutes, and how can you present your key information that is easy to digest, and even attract another 10-min attention? Visualization is an easy way to start, and there are tons of free tools available.

-          Google Public Data Explorer makes large datasets easy to explore, visualize and communicate. As introduced by Google, “students, journalists, policy makers and everyone else can play with the tool to create visualizations of public data, link to them, or embed them in their own webpages”.

-          ManyEyes lets you upload data and visualize it using a wide variety of interesting displays: maps, word trees, tag clouds, tree maps, bubble charts, matrix charts, network diagrams, etc. Here you can check out the China-related data visualization.

-          Tableau Public (Windows only): Another free data visualization tool that help you create interactive visualizations and embed it in your website or share it. Here is an example story: China leads the world in renewable energy investment: They provide clear tutorial on how to use.

FINALLY: SHARPEN YOUR SKILLS

Non-stop self-education is the key in this information-overloaded, technology-savvy world. There are all sorts of self-learning sites, while IJNet is one of the best of them. And you should always stay with the community by being connected on social media, so that you will at least realize that you are out: once you realize that, don’t panic, just shout, get help and share ideas, finally you’ll come up with some great stories.

©2012 馬金馨 Yolanda Ma. All Rights Reserved.

.

白人、男人、死人的板砖大会

星期六, 五月 7th, 2011

The Internet and Social Inequalities

作者James C. Witte, Susan E. Mannon
出版社: Routledge
出版年: 2010-2-11
页数: 192
定价: GBP 23.99
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780415963190

也许正是由于信息技术过于年轻,没有哪一位媒体研究、传播研究的成名人物是在个人电脑诞生之后、互联网风靡之际方才扬名立万;因此,对于网络研究、新媒体研究的各种理论言说,最靠谱的方法便是从所谓“白人男人死人俱乐部”去借个火,谁让为传统的社会理论贡献砖头般巨著的净是白人、男人、死人呢?也可别以为他们都是过时的老古董,这个俱乐部的成员大打口水仗之时,也正是那时的最新科技粉墨登场之际。
《互联网与社会不平等》的作者美国乔治梅森大学的社会学教授James CWitte和犹他州立大学教授Susan EMannon似乎就是想开上一场虚拟的板砖大会,把社会理论三大思潮穿上马甲,让马克思、韦伯与涂尔干各自抢注ID,在论争网络不平等的主帖下面,灌水、掐架、PK。马克思何曾尝试网购,韦伯从未打过网游,涂尔干也没能见过网聊,可谈起社会不平等来说,他们哪个不是口沫横飞、下笔千言?把他们轻车熟路的话题,从现实社会引入网络空间也并非难事。
其实互联网兴起之初就有学者发过个主帖叫“数字鸿沟”。当然它最后成了个板砖横飞的千年大坑。起先数字鸿沟说的是是否有条件上网。后来情况越来越复杂,上网时间、上网频率、网速、上网技能甚至上网的场合实际上都与社会不平等相关。数字鸿沟的内涵与处延不断扩展。因此,《互联网与社会不平等》的作者试图作出区别:互联网的不平等不仅仅在于获取与接入互联网的不平等。随着互联网对日常生活的渗透,或者说我们身处社会正在进行着网络转型,那么对于互联网不平等的考虑也要转向人们如何不同地使用互联网,而且互联网又如何影响社会平等。
论及这类话题,沙发帖当然被马克思占了座。他带领的社会学冲突理论一干人等一阵猛拳:现有的社会不平等,特别是收入与教育程度,这当然带来了网络接入、网络信息占用和网络技能上的不平等。而网络技能的高下又强化原有的不平等,甚至把这种不平等带到下一代。也就是说,有钱人家的娃,电脑用得多,网络玩得转,以后当然更有钱。更何况,从某种意义上来说,新技术其实是为资产家的军火库里新增添的武器。当我们采用与新产品相关的新技术时,实际上正为资本家的市场战略作出贡献。
抢到板凳帖的韦伯,对于沙发帖又顶又踩。按照韦伯文化理论的延伸,社会不平等不仅仅由社会阶级决定,同时也受到社会地位的影响。中产阶级的确将网络技能作为进入劳动力市场的一种优势,所以对于楼上是要顶一下、赞一把。不过按他的观点,楼上的观点还是要踩上一脚,他更强调的是网络行为更加为社会精英作为确定自己身份的生活方式:如果谁觉得自己是个白领,那他就该坐在星巴克里抱着手提电脑、Ipad,上着“非死不可”(Facebook)。
话说到这份上,涂尔干也不能只是“虎躯一震、三分走人”。照这位功能主义学者看来,单个的页面或网站其实就是为特定用户服务的。然而,网络所积累的智慧却是为所有网络用户服务,而无论他们是不是非广泛使用网络,也不论他们是否拥有足够技能。所以网络不平等当然存在,不过对于社会而言,这算不得什么大事。
可别以为《互联网与社会不平等》就是社会学者们摇起招魂幡,让白、男、死人们借尸还魂、指桑骂槐。此书的两位作者,恰恰是从美国相关机构的调查数据出发,并用量化的数据来验证社会理论的三种思潮对互联网不平等的解读。而他们本人的总结性发言则是:不论如何解读,都显示一个清晰的事实——— 的确存在互联网不平等,而这种不平等也正随着互联网向日常生活的渗透,而不断加深,互联网上的不平等也影响着我们生活的社会的不平等。由于两位教授所基于的仅是美国社会1997年至2007年的调查统计数据,因此他们所谈论的互联网不平等仅仅是在一个经济发达同时也是网络运用广泛国家的情况。国与国之间所存在的不平等,他们无从谈论。当然像中国是否存在类似情况,他们更是没有发言权。这个问题只怕要让在星巴克里无线上网的中国白领和窝在二、三线城市的网吧里打着网游的辍学青年们开个板砖大会来讨论一下吧。

此文载《南方都市报》2011-04-24

http://gcontent.oeeee.com/0/ba/0ba7e0f75158b6f7/Blog/a02/03da5d.html

中国互联网

星期四, 五月 5th, 2011

via the opening hours

成语配图:熟视无睹

星期四, 十一月 18th, 2010
class="center"> href="http://blog.ticktag.org/wp-images/blogimage/2010/11/what-you-dont-see.jpg"> src="http://blog.ticktag.org/wp-images/blogimage/2010/11/what-you-dont-see-150x128.jpg" alt="" title="what-you-dont-see" width="150" height="128" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-7250" />

悲剧太多就变成了日常——这是一个群体的麻木不仁。image via href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/11/in_protest.html">TBP

Collateral Damage

星期一, 十月 18th, 2010

Kudos to whoever on blocking or demobilizing Edgecast CDN.

List of victims (partially affected): jquery, wordpress, gravatar, tumblr, technorati, viddler, woopra, break.com, espn, gawker, webqq, t.qq.com, gov.cn etc.

Through the power of CDN reseller, we are truly bringing the Collateral Damage home.

With greater user base, comes greater service blockage

星期日, 十月 10th, 2010

为避免有同志羡慕朝鲜新开的互联网,看看朝鲜现在封什么……

Radio and TV sets in North Korea are pre-tuned to government stations that pump out a steady stream of propaganda.

收音机与电视被预设为官方频道,专门播放洗脑宣传信息。

Ordinary North Koreans caught listening to foreign broadcasts risk harsh punishments, such as forced labour. The authorities attempt to jam foreign-based and dissident radio stations.

非法收听国外电台与电视广播的国民要冒被强制劳役的风险,官方用各种手段阻碍国外与异见电台。

The “only glimmer of hope”, according to RSF, is the “communications black market” on the North Korean-Chinese border. Recordings of South Korean TV soaps and films are said to circulate.

无国界记者组织称,仅有的希望之光,来自朝中边境的“信息交流黑市”,那里贩卖来自韩国的各种电视连续剧与电影。

North Korea has a minimal internet presence. The web pages of official news agency KCNA are hosted by the agency’s bureau in Japan.

朝鲜的互联网存在感极低,其官方媒体KCNA的网站由驻日本的代理开设。

别忘了深圳在上世纪80-90年代也定向干扰香港电台,现在已经完全不管了,全面转入电视与网络干涉。

via BBC: North Korea Country Profile & XKCD

让互联网死亡,让互联网成长

星期五, 九月 3rd, 2010

Chris Anderson是一个喜欢提前下定论的人。若非他有这种性格,Wired杂志的总编也轮不到他。Chris的上一个理论“长尾”我至今认为是正确的,只不过整个商业互联网都过于乐观的估计了利用长尾盈利的难度。无数开发与投资者败在长尾的诱惑下,无奈之余,纷纷上网声讨这位长尾概念的总结者。长尾的精髓,被淹没在叫骂声中,逐渐黯淡了下来。

时隔数年,长尾效应隐退热门网络名词圈,我们迎来了传统媒体痛不欲生的年代。时代杂志的封面人物不再备受争议,取而代之的是它被4chan搞乱的网络投票;可想而知,Wired杂志的日子好不到哪去。在大举进军iPad读者市场之后,身为总编的Chris一不做二不休,再次发功制造了互联网之死的头条新闻;霎时间讨论四起,网络名嘴大炮互射……就为了证明一个不变的事实:错误而概括性的结论往往比详细而中立的分析报告更能产生流量

说完Chris Anderson与Wired,让我们回到互联网老不死的问题上。

尽管广义的“互联网已死”毫无根据,狭义的“公共网已死”片面滑稽,我却认为这个传说中的涅盘是互联网泡沫的真实终结,也是长尾盛开的标准答案。我们如今所说的网络之死,并不是指任何一种网络媒介的消逝,不是静态网页,不是开放论坛,而是商业网络幼稚年代的结束。相比之下,承载它的是HTML5标准还是RIA垄断,不过是后话。

网络商业化的信号,源于互联网公地的消逝。

从一个理想主义者的角度出发,我们应该尽可能通过教育来阻止“公地悲剧”发生,而不是通过“圈地运动”来回避人类道德上的落后。从一个现实主义者的角度出发,不允许圈地运动,就是不允许资本累积,就是走传说中的提前共产主义。也许我们的心向往着前者,但我们的大脑深知在这个经济环境下玩共产主义的最终后果。

是什么力量维持着这种“平等,免费”的互联网至今?互联网的用户基数。新世纪第一次网络经济泡沫,给互联网服务留下了巨大的空间,允许绝大部分公司睁一只眼闭一只眼的琢磨长尾,甚少与竞争对手决一死战。

但10年的公地试用期结束了,所有公司都意识到,让开放互联网直接受益人(用户)主动断奶是一件痛苦的事情;而日渐激烈的服务竞争只会加重这种利益上的渴望与摩擦。怎么办?互联网难道还需要乱战10年?

这时请你回忆长尾概念的核心,你会发现这个“80%小众=20%大众”的概念让所有参与者难免入侵对手的领地——假如他们希望在80%的基础上扩大盈利。乍看下来,长尾不过是一种重复建设,违背了工业革命分工合作的原则。

但人类是喜欢建立秩序的社会化群体,多年经验告诉我们,秩序暗示着效率。为避免公地悲剧重复发生,也为了扩大自身私利,网络圈地运动开始了。但圈地的人并不是这些长尾公司,而是那些依赖20%成为大鳄的科技公司

当然,“圈地”的比喻或许不大准确,毕竟互联网是一种高流动性的媒体。那好,把地换做天空如何?反正这年头哪个公司不是“云”里雾里?

于是有趣的场面来了,几家巨头分别占据着互联网的一片天空,而依靠天空为生的小弟们就通过这些云来承载自己的长尾。如此一来,你的客户虽然多样化,却也局限在对应的云里——减少过度竞争,增加资源控制,大家都在自己的地盘上做事。遇上纠纷?由对应大公司牵头,咱们到边界上谈判,谈不拢再开战。

你现在看到长尾战役的胜利条件没?就是让“互联网出现边际”。这里不是指地理位置上的边际,那种语言和文化上的障碍早已存在。我是指大公司圈地运动后的虚拟边境;边境冲突让跨境商业将变得困难,却也保护了境内商业的正常运作。

在我看来,这就是接下来10年的互联网新格局。大公司入侵他人的领地,小公司选择他们的主子。那个有如大锅饭的稚嫩互联网不复存在,我们将在云中的小灶见面

Wired那篇社论的讨论重点还包括互联网之死的主谋。我个人举双手同意“用户杀了互联网”的观点。不,我知道你只想要一个开放的互联网,但你的行为是否吻合这种你的愿望?为什么在BT有公开Tracker的时候,你会去使用Private Tracker?为什么在公共P2P大行其道的今天,你还要付费去用某些公司的封闭P2P下载?

理由大抵能总结为:因为它提供我想要的东西,别得我没多想

这是一个困局,一方面我们希望互联网给予我们无限的自由,一方面我们又愿意用自由交换自己需要的资源。融合两者的结论是,我们的最终期望并不是互联网开放,而是一切资源都是无限且免费的。

上一代的互联网公地就是这样枯竭的,所有人都在为自己的短期利益服务,最终大家的长期利益均被损害。下一代的互联网将会利用亚当斯密200多年前总结的概念——无形的手,确保同样的结局不再发生。

于是我说,没错,我们所知道的那个互联网死去了;但死去又何妨,我知道它必定会以更成熟的模式存活下去,即便我们的良心不能接受那个模式。

。image credit: ふぉ~ど (第一幅已被删除)

中国网媒能从BBC身上学些什么?

星期日, 五月 30th, 2010

原文Why does the BBC want to send its readers away? The value of linking by Jonathan Stray, Nieman Journalism Lab of Harvard University

翻译与整理David Frank

前言

常来客栈的旅客都知道,我们对国内网媒门户的运营模式是颇有微词的。众口一调的政策现状先不谈,它们对新闻粗糙的转载切割也让人心痛——如何打造更有信服力的媒体,本文从有关BBC改革的一篇评论开始谈。

正文

为什么BBC想转发它的读者?浅谈链接的价值。

BBC准备在2013年之前将它们的离站点击数提高一倍;没错,他们正在有意识的将读者送出网站。在BBC最近的一篇官方博文中,新闻编辑Steve Herrmann引用公司最新的战略检讨文档,里面提及了这个目标:

将网站建设成互联网的窗口,在每个新闻页面上提供至少一条对外链接,让这些链接的月均点击通过率翻倍。

平均每篇文章提供一条离站链接,对任何老练的博主来说都是非常低的数值;但主动提高离站点击率在主流新闻媒体中的确是创举。这个目标或许会让那些支持筑高墙封闭式花园的门户运营者困惑,引起那些将聚合服务看作寄生虫的编辑的怒吼与抗议,但Herrmann称BBC将外链看作“为读者服务”。

相关链接非常重要——它们是新闻报道的附加价值;好好选择它们,尽可能连接新闻的源头,假如你引用了其他出版物,报纸与网站的文字,连向它们。

别忘了,这个战略检讨发生在BBC可能被裁剪预算高达6亿英镑的同期,后者占BBC多达15%的支出,其中包括了网络门户25%的预算。BBC网站将被迫于2013年之前把新闻栏目数减半。与此同时,BBC还延后了英国本土iPad与iPhone阅读软件的发布日期,基于业内抱怨它将把私人新闻社挤出了市场(美国用户已经可以使用该iPad软件)。

BBC增加站外链接的决策是一次编辑方针改革还是转移财政缩减的视线?他们是在为读者提供有价值的参考信息,还是被监管机构限制了新闻报道的范围?抑或是他们准备转型为聚合型的新闻机构?为此我专程访问了Herrmann,他回复我的邮件说道:

这个战略将BBC设想为一个公共的文化空间,一个不推销任何东西,可以被信任的领域。它为BBC与其他公共文化团体的合作路线做出了定位。BBC的目标是在扩大这个公共空间的同时,分享与促进多样化的内容。

回到BBC在线的主旨,除了报道新闻,天气,体育与电视节目,是应该成为“互联网的窗口”,引导听众找到网络上最好的内容,并积极与站外服务合作。这是我们促进点击通过率的原因。

尽管如此,他也承认了这个决策涉及对反竞争行为的顾虑,“我们的确要给其他机构留下报道空间”,他写到。

这个变动也意味着增加透明度。在这个来源文档电子化网络化的时代,读者与记者拥有相同的新闻材料并不奇怪;然而提供信息源仍不常见于新闻机构操守,我询问了Herrmann有关BBC的信息源政策。

我在博文中也提到,连向最相关最有用的信息,包括源文件,应该成为我们的编辑原则。这并不是什么创新,读者对我们以前提供的政府的预算公告细节就很感兴趣。我们是在复述这个原则,并明确我们希望尽力完善来源链接的意向。细节上当然还有一些难度,例如在写作时文档并没有公开,或者文档需要付费才能阅读,这些细节都值得我们深入思考。我对在用户详尽反馈的帮助下打造最佳的新闻政策深感兴趣。

在Herrmann原博文下有用户之间的活跃讨论,对学术杂志与其他非免费来源的分享模式尤其受关注。值得一提的是DocumentCloud计划,它们正在建立一个严肃的新闻文档库,包括对未发布的文档进行限时保护

但这种链接模式是否适用于你的竞争对手?各司其职,链接最佳内容的新媒体座右铭自然没错,但传统媒体普遍对转发读者颇为忌讳。BBC准备打破这种僵局,增多对手的新闻链接吗?

没错,包括其他新闻机构与信息来源。这是我那篇博文的重点所在。我们还在研究这种模式对我们日常新闻处理的影响,以及如何更多更好的添加链接。从我们成立的第一天开始就有站外链接,我们也早已有自动化模块从其他新闻机构获取相关信息。但如何让科技更好的为我们服务,以及记者们应该如何改变自己报道新闻的习惯,仍需时间分析。

聚合服务的繁荣是因为用户觉得它们实用。每周回顾与十佳列表仍是博客最常用的写作模式。虽然新闻报道常常要求“字句有出处”,但实际执行过程中维基百科却常比新闻更准确的连接至相关来源。这么看来,BBC的政策转变不无道理。

后话

站外链接还是站内链接,这是一个问题。

超链接是互联网最重要的元素,没有它们,我们这代人熟悉的互联网将不复存在;也许Web 3.0能摆脱这根古老的支柱,但超越点击的时代还没到来——20年,我们只学会了滚动与拖拽。

所有站主都知道链接的重要性,这是Yahoo与Google教会我们的基本生存技能。但连向哪里,却一直是困扰国内网媒的谜题。

SEO专家告诉领导,连接站内关键词是最好的选择;头条编辑告诉领导,连接站内新闻热点是最好的选择;宣传组长告诉领导,连接站内广告与服务是最好的选择。偏偏没人告诉这些领导,站外链接能为网站赚来更多的读者,即便它们看起来卑微弱小兼无利可图。

正如原文下的留言者所述,不管BBC外链的真实意图如何,这都是极为高明的未雨绸缪。链接提高文章的价值,网站会赚得更多的连入;网站改变读者群的阅读习惯,使自己成为读者喜爱的窗口与通道;与其他机构合作,侧面增加新闻报道的多样性……看似送走了读者,看似降低了点击,看似减少了报道,其实上恰恰相反,BBC通过站外链接更牢固的控制了网络战场。

在中国,甚少网媒编辑相信这种资讯多样化。他们准确的执行着上级任务,把网站打扮成独立的新闻来源,用复制头条,原创翻译与来源未知的报道装点门户。我理解他们的心情,没有新闻来源,读者跳槽到新闻来源的机会就会大大减少。让读者知识停滞在自己网站的水平线上,何乐而不为?

然而他们忘了,对网络用户最形象的比喻是时刻在激烈碰撞的气体分子。伪造的新闻独家,只能成为新用户的歇脚点,无法维持长期的通道效应,更不能生出类似主流媒体的品牌效应——最好的结局,也仅仅是在读者流入与流失曲线中找到一个较高的平衡点。

中国网媒必须醒悟,互联网不欢迎并时刻颠覆着单调信息源,这个世界上已经没有多少组织在促进大合唱的信息源了。仅剩的几家之一,是培养人弹与冷血杀手的塔利班孤儿学校。另外一家,也轮不到你们来提鞋。

固守堡垒,任何网媒都会被同类网站所淹没。这是无可避免的事情,若你可以用金钱与人力打造一个网媒,别人何尝不可?给读者一个阅读你的独特理由,否则读者只会选择最便宜最方便的那家。别忘了互联网是畅通的,把你的赌注放在相反的方向,等待你的将是悲剧。

连接出去!让你的读者发现你以外的网站,让你的用户认识你的网络世界——不要假设离开的人不再返回,因为谁也说不准气体分子啥时候又回到原点,但它比假设分子总在某一点附近打转靠谱多了。

China Media Digest 0903 (week7)

星期日, 二月 15th, 2009

TVCC of CCTV on fire

tvcc-of-cctv-on-fireThe northern building of the new CCTV complex was caught fire on Feb. 9, at around 8:00pm. The fire spread quickly and soon the entire structure was in flames.

The 44-storey building, about 200 meters from the iconic CCTV tower, houses the Television Culture Center (TVCC), the luxury Mandarin Oriental Hotel and an electronic data processing center.

According to Juliet Ye of WSJ, “people packed China’s online forums and blogs, uploaded pictures taken from the fiery scene and hit the streets to conduct their own reporting.” You can also find some collections in Danwei, or CNReviews, and “A Photo Play Of The CCTV Fire”, from ESWN. Click here to see the video filmed by BBC staffs.

The incident hasn’t been featured all that prominently on news portal front pages. An unproven guideline on the fire report was distributed online,

“All networks:

Regarding the “CCTV New North Side Building on Fire” report, all sites must use only the Xinhua news script. Do not post pictures, videos; do not report in depth; only post in Domestic (Chinese) news; close all posts and replies; do not put this as the “top topic”; do not place this in “Recommended Articles”.” — source: CNReviews.com

It turned out that CCTV itself is responsible for Monday’s massive fire (via China Daily). At the day after the fire, an office director at CCTV and 11 others have been detained by the Beijing police for questioning, according to state news agency Xinhua. Chinese continued to dissect the event online with a sardonic tilt. See EEO’s story about Chinese online reaction.

Via China Digital Time,

China’s young and hottest blogger Han Han (韩寒) took fire at CCTV once again. This blogpost, written on Feb. 11, has once again been deleted from his Sina blog, but remains on the recently “resurrected” Bullog International website (hosted in United States.) The witty, sarcastic content is being re-posted by thousands of netizens within the Great Firewall.

You can find Han Han’s article in English (translated by CDT) in the link above.

The China Blog of TIME, “The Problem With CCTV” mentioned a pointed critique of one recent CCTV program after the fire.

Publishing still hot

China Daily says, Publishing still hot on bourses,

If you think the publishing industry is going irreversibly downhill in this Internet age, think again. It is fast becoming one of the hottest sectors in the Chinese stock market, thanks to government support, in a big way.

The State Council issued a new provision last year to support development of the culture industry. It is believed that the policy has underscored the future profits and development of publishing companies. Below is another news about publishing industry in China, “Media reform in China by the end of 2010, says GAPP”,

“By the end of 2010, all for-profit news media and publishing entities will be decoupled from the government institutions they are affiliated with and transformed into separate companies. The government will no longer place restrictions on them in terms of ISBN numbers, publication licenses, and content.”

Journalist “black list”

Via Reuters,

Li Dongdong, a deputy chief of the General Administration of Press and Publication, told officials that proposed strengthened regulations for Chinese journalists would include a “full database of people who engage in unhealthy professional conduct”, the China News Service reported.

“People entered into the transgressor list will be excluded from engaging in news reporting and editing work,” the report said, citing Li.

Other links you might be interested in

The China Media Digest is released by China Media Centre weekly. It is posted here for the readers of OhMyMedia.

关键词:, , , , , , ,

相关文章

China Media Digest 0902 (week5-6)

星期日, 二月 8th, 2009

2008 China Internet Communication Report

Click to download the English version of the report The report is released by NetEase.com, Inc. (163.com,网易), one of the leading Internet technology companies in China, in January, 2009. The report includes an annual top-10 ranking of Internet Hot Figures, Internet Hot Key Words, Entertainment Stars, Sports Persons, Entrepreneurs, Hot Movies, Hot Music Singles, Hot TV series, Fund companies, and A-share listed companies. The report summarizes facts of maximum interest to Chinese netizens in these ten fields as well as highlights common features and the latest status of such information. According to the report,

Who determines the report result? There are about 200 million netizens in China who are active in the application of various NetEase Internet products. They come from different regions of China and are engaged in different industries, but every click or search they have done, and any words they have posted on the Internet, have contributed to this report.

How was the data analyzed? The data was analyzed by collecting original data from five system platforms of NetEase, i.e., NetEase Blog, NetEase BBS, Youdao Search Engine, Netease Channels, and NetEase Posts. Such data were then used for linear conversion and linear transformation by standard statistical methods without changing the data order or distribution form. This produced a normal status measure, called the Internet transmission index, for each respective collection item.

It’s really worth reading if you are interested in the culture of China society and Chinese cyberspace. Just click the links to download the English version and Chinese version. Other related links:

Film ratings system: news, fake news or “old news” ?

Tong Gang in 2004

Tong Gang in 2004

From Danwei:

On February 2, Beijing Business Today ran a report under the headline “Tong Gang: A film ratings system will not permit Cat-III films.” The article reported that China had completed work on a law that would implement a film ratings system without opening the door to porn, and featured extensive quotes from Film Bureau director Tong Gang.

Implementing a film ratings system is a contentious issue that has been kicking around for years, so Tong’s disclosure, if correct, has the potential to bring major changes to the domestic film industry.

Too bad it’s not true: the director did utter the words quoted in the article, but he said them in an interview with The Beijing News in 2004.

Some Newspapers and even Xinhua were deceived by the story of Beijing Business Today. They used the headline such as “China completes motion picture law, banning porn, violence contents”. Unfortunately, it seems just a clumsy copy of a five-year-old interview.

A ‘Chinese CNN’

Following the first topic in CMD 0901, Peter Ford, a staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, quoted the comment from two Chinese scholars in his article “Beijing launching a ‘Chinese CNN’ to burnish image abroad”,

“China’s image is very important, but the first question is the image of the medium itself,” cautions Gong Wenxiang, journalism professor at Peking University. “If the medium lacks credibility, it is unthinkable that it will improve the country’s image.”

“The strength of our voice does not match our position in the world,” complains Yu Guoming, deputy dean of the journalism school at People’s University in Beijing, who has acted as a consultant on the government’s TV project.

“That affects the extent to which China is accepted by the world,” Professor Yu adds. “If our voice does not match our role, however strong we are we remain a crippled giant.”

“The outreach effort is very natural because of the growing strength of the nation,” says Professor Gong. “They [officials] are clear about what to say but they don’t know how to say it with the best results.”

And so long as the party insists on controlling the media, China will have difficulty convincing foreign viewers to consider its point of view, he adds. “They have realized the problem of cross-cultural communications, but before serious political reform takes place they cannot do much.”

Anti-anti-vulgarity Campaign: Put Clothes on Famous Paintings

spring

Chinese Internet users angered by censorship in cyberspace have dressed up images of famous renaissance nudes in a protest against Beijing’s crackdown on ‘vulgar’ online content. The campaign of “Put Clothes on Famous Paintings” (给名画穿衣服)

Via “Protest against Web crackdown”

dance

The protest began last week after a user of the social networking site Douban.com complained that images of several paintings, including Titian’s nude ‘Venus of Urbino’, had been deleted from an online photo album.

According to blogs on the site, Douban’s administrators had told the user that posting pornography would endanger the site’s operations.

In response, protest’s organisers asked Internet users to clothe artwork to ’save’ it from the censors, who have shut down 1,635 websites and 200 blogs in a one-month campaign against content that ‘harms public morality’.

The protest are not limited to 16th century art – one Internet user drew red underpants on the leaning, joined towers of state-run China Central Television’s headquarters in Beijing.

Also see the blog post “Chinese Netizens’ Anti-anti-vulgarity Campaign: Putting Clothes on Renaissance Paintings”.

73ddcaf222a87ff4a28ba4162c671423 83ee144ab61651b1d87428d98cab1843

More fancy pictures, check these blogs: Digging Pictures, Snower41.

Other Links you might be interested in

The China Media Digest is released by China Media Centre weekly. It is posted here for the readers of OhMyMedia.

关键词:, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

相关文章

China Media Digest 0901 (week1-4)

星期一, 二月 2nd, 2009

RMB 45 Billion, soft power and global influence

cctv-new-buildingAccording to the story of South China Morning Post (all articles behind a paywall), Beijing will invest RMB 45 billion (about GBP 4.5 billion) in Chinese media organizations which target global audiences. The list will include CCTV, Xinhua and the People’s Daily. China wants it’s own Al-Jazeera.

Management at CCTV, Xinhua and the People’s Daily have been busy meeting consultants, inviting experts to brainstorming sessions and drafting proposals. “Xinhua has a plan to expand its overseas bureaus from about 100 to 186,” the source said, suggesting it would have bases in virtually every country in the world. Another media source said Xinhua planned to create an Asia-based 24-hour television station to broadcast global news to an international audience. “I was invited twice for brainstorming meetings on the establishment of such a television station, which would not just broadcast news on China, but on everywhere in the world,” a different source said. The media sources said Xinhua was ambitious about building an “influential and reliable” station like the Qatar-based Al-Jazeera network. “With Al-Jazeera as the model, the station would enjoy greater freedom of speech from the central authorities than Phoenix TV on political and current events,” one source said. Meanwhile, the Global Times, a daily tabloid owned by the People’s Daily and known for its nationalistic tone, has decided to launch an English edition in May, becoming the second national English newspaper, after China Daily. The paper has begun recruiting English-speaking editors and journalists. CCTV has announced plans to launch Arabic and Russian channels this year, aggressively expanding its team of overseas reporters and recruiting foreign-language professionals.

Below is the comment from Cam MacMurchy at Zhongnanhai Blog,

Isn’t CCTV 9 supposed to present China’s view to the world? Is there a point in lauching a second one without fixing the first? The problem isn’t lack of TV channels or media outlets that present China’s case to foreigners, it’s the lack of any media outlets that present China’s case well. If Xinhua’s new TV endeavor is run in the same manner CCTV is, with the same group of life-long communisty party members in bad suits calling the shots, it will be doomed to failure. In fact, I’d go one step further: any mainland Chinese run media outlet will be taken less seriously as long as general media controls are in place. Which brings me to my second point: the credibility of the media in China. China could open a hundred news organizations and blanket the world with China’s point of view, but it would be greeted with just as much suspicion as it is now because China, despite all of its advancements, remains a one-party state with absolute control over all domestic media.

James Fallows also asked, “Will $6 billion solve the Chinese PR problem?” Nicholas Bequelin at Wall Street Journal Asia described it as “China’s New Propaganda Machine Going Global”. David Bandurski at China Media Project noted the relationship between “soft power” or “global influence” and the huge investment project. A speech of Li Changchun (李长春) is quoted and translated in the article.

Chinese Internet users hits 298 million

From AP,

China’s fast-growing population of Internet users has risen to 298 million after passing the United States last year to become the world’s largest, a government-sanctioned research group said. The latest figure is a 41.9 percent increase over the same period last year, the China Internet Network Information Center said in a report Tuesday. China’s Internet penetration rate is still low, with just 22.6 percent of its population online, leaving more room for rapid growth, according to CNNIC.

The 23rd Statistical Reports on the Internet Development in China was released by CNNIC on Jan. 13, 2009. You can find the full report (in Chinese) on CNNIC’s website. Keep an eye on this page if you are interested in the forthcoming English version (the last 22 reports are all provided there). Or check the further more details here, a brief translation of the latest report by 56minus1. So many netizens, well, some of them even take on the government.

“Anti-vulgar Internet Crackdown”

jingjingwebpoliceFrom the beginning of 2009, China has already announced 6 blacklists of websites criticized for “low and vulgar practices on the Internet” as part of the latest “Anti-vulgar Internet Crackdown”(整治互联网低俗之风). According to Xinhua, the first blacklist of 19 websites “that provide and spread pornographic or obscene contents”, including searching engines Google, Baidu and major portals such as Sina, Sohu, Netease, QQ. Microsoft’s MSN is also in the blacklist of Internet portals providing lewd content. And

This marks a month-long nationwide campaign launched by the Information Office of the State Council, Ministry of Public Security and other four central government departments to clean up the online environment. Those websites were accused of either providing links to pornographic websites or containing porn pictures and failed to take them down after being notified by China Internet Illegal Information Reporting Center(CIIRC).

After that, 277 vulgar websites shut down in 11 days. Further more, Anti-porn campaign extends to mobile phone messages (from Xinhua),

The Chinese government is extending its anti-porn campaign to mobile phone messages after shutting down 1,250 websites, it said on Monday. “We will incorporate ‘lewd’ messages spread via mobile phones into the crackdown,” said seven government departments including the State Council’s Information Office, Ministry of Public Security and Ministry of Culture who jointly launched the campaign at a meeting, aiming to outline future tasks of the move.

Reuters reports,

Over 40 people have been detained for disseminating porn on the Internet, and over 3 million “items of online information” have been deleted, the report said.

Xinhua also reports that officials will be increasingly vigilant during the Spring Festival, or Chinese New Year:

China’s Internet watchdogs Friday vowed to continue a crackdown on pornography and “lewd” content throughout the weeklong Spring Festival holiday in order to protect the nation’s youth. “The campaign has a single and clear goal, that is to clean up the Internet and save the Internet environment for children,” said Liu Zhengrong, deputy director of the network office of the State Council’s Information Office.

You can find 6 lists (only in Chinese) of websites criticized in the campaign in the website of China Internet Illegal Information Reporting Center (中国互联网违法和不良信息举报中心). The last one was unveiled on Jan. 29. During the Campaign, bullog.cn, an edgy China blog site was also shut down. The founder of bullog.cn told The Associated Press that he was notified by an e-mail from the Beijing Communications Administration that the site “contained harmful comments on current affairs and therefore will be closed”. There are some Chinese bloggers’ response to the Internet crackdown translated by China Digital Times.

Other Links you might be interested in

The China Media Digest is released by China Media Centre. I also post it here for the readers of OhMyMedia.

关键词:, , , , , , ,

相关文章